|
|
Post by Robert on Feb 25, 2008 7:40:16 GMT 8
|
|
|
|
Post by jonathan on Feb 25, 2008 7:53:57 GMT 8
Hi Robert...
Actually i don't know what species it is but i just admire those photo that you took...
Very beautiful i like the pic no 7 nice compose and no 8 close up.... your lens? (120 mm)?
Regards
Jonathan
|
|
|
|
Post by Robert on Feb 25, 2008 21:41:42 GMT 8
Jonathan, I use micro lens 105mm. If you're using 120mm that would give you larger magnification, are you?
|
|
|
|
Post by piscesilim on Feb 25, 2008 22:13:49 GMT 8
Are all of the flower come from the same plant? Because the last pic look like U. caerulea. But the second last pic look like U. uliginosa.
|
|
|
|
Post by Robert on Feb 25, 2008 23:24:31 GMT 8
Lim, flowers were from different plant. They were from the same pool. I notice the differences while photographing, and perhaps the flowers were at different development stage. I maybe wrong.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonathan on Feb 26, 2008 1:32:15 GMT 8
Hi Robert,
Nope... i dun own an DSLR yet or should i say i dun have any camera for now.... out of my budget...
Normally when i do close up shoot on small object i'll try to use a longer lens for the magnification and detail shoot....
for ISO400 it's still pretty detail... anyway loves your pic robert... thanks for sharing the detail with me... when you sahre i get to learn... hehe thanks..
Cheerio
Jonathan
|
|
|
|
Post by piscesilim on Feb 26, 2008 11:25:24 GMT 8
Are those flowers same size?
|
|
|
|
Post by Robert on Feb 26, 2008 12:23:56 GMT 8
yup,same size. A friend took some clumps home. If there are flowers attached i maybe able to take some photos. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Robert on Feb 28, 2008 9:36:59 GMT 8
Hello Lim, you maybe right with the id. The former (U. caerulea) are numerous and i must have chosen a diifferent one (U. uliginosa) as my photography subject, which are not many, few happened to be there. Probably they are numerous in adjacent area. My friend noted the difference but thought they 're the same species. Many thanks.
|
|
